Even a Train Wreck Can Be Slow

(Just my thoughts & opinion folks)

I quit working (at least for a company) 2-1/2 years ago. It appears my timing was pretty good. I'd hit my peak with the company and there was a sense that the company was either rudder less or had too many. I couldn't tell. What I could tell was that (in my opinion) top management believed in the philosophy that if you believe something strong enough and force (?) others to do the same that it will become true.

It doesn't.

Buy a bunch of small companies and mush them together, tell every one that they must be "ALL IN" (or else) and have middle management in echo chambers will produce great results.

It doesn't.

My timetable was my own and I had my own plans. I followed them and I left. Turns out my timing was good.

I was there a long time (in Software engineering time it was forever) and saw the company change hands (or primary structure) about every 3 years. People stayed the same and for a while times where good. But life does not stand still, it demands change and this company did not.

Same direction, just faster.

Same people, no other opinions.

Same technology, hitting same limits.

During my last year I plotted out a timeline of current (long in the tooth) products and looked for change and replacements. For me, it was not promising what I saw. Product managers only stayed about 2 years before being pushed out (as the real power of direction lay with intrenched others wanting to hold unto power). It felt like all ad hoc wishful thinking.

Nothing happens fast in corporate collapse. It all takes time, but it will happen.

Pushing to increase sales will only work for a short time unless there is quality product to sell, otherwise sales will stall and collapse. Pushing and pushing sales while cutting staff kind of tells you something.

From the sidelines I watch over the next 2-1/2 years as sales increase but so did debt. The mothership (the large company that owned this company) appeared to take actions that its days where numbered as far as ownership. Benefits where cut, promises broken and moral.... I'm guessing, was not good. It had bought a big chunk of the company from a private equity firm years ago and now it was selling it to a different private equity firm.

The cycle of company life is coming back around.

The company will live on. Top management will be replaced in a year or so (I'm guessing) and staffing, locations, benefits, products trimmed to enable a return to profitability. It will be shinned up and patched for the next time it's sold.

Interesting to watch from afar.

Comments

My Current Desktop and Happy Vining.

It's been a big switch when I quit my old procession (Software Engineer) and ventured into the unknown. So this is my current desktop. First it's a REAL desktop and not a computer screen. Second, I've had to learn a whole new set of tools. You would think a pencil is just a pencil and a paint brush is just a paint brush, but noooooo, they are tools into you mind and that's what needs re-tooling. The tactual nature of these tools and operation as much more rewarding (and frustrating too) than typing code in an IDE. That had it's incentive but that well went dry and life changes, so I changed. The pleasure of creating colors (no RGB involved) ad hoc wise is interesting. Getting the technique to merge them on paper is very tough. You do not know what you're going to get, so you just have to go with it. I'm glad that I can do a lot of other things instead of Software, but I hope that others in my past procession work on other pa...

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right. This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing? This time, the light was right. It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right. The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field. I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right. This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right. The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!). The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background. Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king. Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...

Thought Patterns

I know how I work. How a think about, visualize a problem and go about mentally design a solution and implement it in code. My thought pattern works pretty well for me on most occasions, but not always. There are times when I have a force myself to change my thought pattern because of the problem I'm solving requires a different mindset. Anyway, this posting is about how I work most of the time. Here is goes. I quickly break down a feature into operations that are required to exists and tackle that code first. My thinking is that, if I can solve the primary issues first, then secondary features will fall into "known knowns" and I can address those at anytime (and sometimes at my leisure) and this allows me to meet my internal timeline. If I addressed features and operations that are not primary first, then I feel I risk my (and the projects) timeline without addressing issues that allow the feature to operate. You may have seen this occur where...

A Person, Artist, Software Engineer, Geologist.

Search This Blog