Skip to main content

Fly Fishing For Native Trout (in the east anyway)


In the Mountain west there are a lot of areas with native wild trout, but the east is a bit different.  The mountains are lower, the temps are warmer and the headwaters are much smaller.  We have native wild trout but this all results in them being much smaller.  Yeah, you can find bigger beasts hiding out in some deeper pools, but for now I'm focusing on the mainstream trout that are found in most of these areas.

Let me set the scene for you.  The head waters range from about 2300' to 5000' hight.  There are no high mountain valleys as the mountains are old and worn down from millions of years of erosion.  The resulting topology is that of streams creased into a network of drainages scattered throughout the Appalachian range.  The streams are almost always at the bottom of these V shaped drainages with few flat spots for slow waters.  What you find instead are rounded boulders where silt has created pocket water pools spaced up the elevation gain and the banks covered with rhododendron and other plants and trees.  As the drainage basin maybe only a few miles from your fishing area, the amount of water contained in these streams is limited (stay out during rainstorms though) to maybe only a few feet across and a few inches to a foot or more.  It's here where the native trout live and where you may find yourself fishing.  

Kind of a tough spot to fish.

There most likely is not a trail that follows the stream so you make your way up the stream working over and around rocks, boulders and logs.

So far so good, now for actually fishing.

The same general rules apply for where the fish can be found.  Deeper pools (1-3' deep), below the inflow channel and behind rocks and misc alcoves.  All well and good but there may only be a few fish in each pocket water section and they can see you and can swim real fast.  You may only get 1 or 2 casts for a section before spooking the fish and either moving on or waiting 10-15 minutes for them to settle down.  

As the water is shallow and clear, the fish can see you real well.  The fish will see you well before you see them.  You may only see them as a shadow that traverses the water to disappear out of view before your first cast.

I've used my 10' Tenkara rod and my 7'6" 3wt rod in these sections.  My needs fall between these two.  I like my Tenkara rod but need to shorten the line quite a bit.  I just need to get the reach to cast into the next upstream pocket.

On the other side, there are many times I'm behind a tree or rock and don't need the long reach but upstream cast to hit my target.  In the end, I find that most of the time I've spooked the fish and when I do get lucky, it's unexpected.  I've found a pocket where the fish either does not see me or is in hiding.  But it's nice to be lucky once in a while.

I've got my eye on another headwater section but I'm waiting for fall to clear out some of the side vegetation.  I've been there before (very few people even go up there, let alone fish) and I know there are fish there, now to catch them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Current Desktop and Happy Vining.

It's been a big switch when I quit my old procession (Software Engineer) and ventured into the unknown.  So this is my current desktop.   First it's a REAL desktop and not a computer screen. Second, I've had to learn a whole new set of tools.  You would think a pencil is just a pencil and a paint brush is just a paint brush, but noooooo, they are tools into you mind and that's what needs re-tooling. The tactual nature of these tools and operation as much more rewarding (and frustrating too) than typing code in an IDE.   That had it's incentive but that well went dry and life changes,  so I changed. The pleasure of creating colors (no RGB involved) ad hoc wise is interesting.  Getting the technique to merge them on paper is very tough.  You do not know what you're going to get, so you just have to go with it. I'm glad that I can do a lot of other things instead of Software, but I hope that others in my past procession work on other pa...

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right.  This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing?  This time, the light was right.  It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right.  The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field.  I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right.  This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right.  The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!).  The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background.  Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king.  Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...

Thought Patterns

I know how I work.  How a think about, visualize a problem and go about mentally design a solution and implement it in code.  My thought pattern works pretty well for me on most occasions, but not always. There are times when I have a force myself to change my thought pattern because of the problem I'm solving requires a different mindset.  Anyway, this posting is about how I work most of the time.  Here is goes. I quickly break down a feature into operations that are required to exists and tackle that code first.  My thinking is that, if I can solve the primary issues first, then secondary features will fall into "known knowns" and I can address those at anytime (and sometimes at my leisure) and this allows me to meet my internal timeline. If I addressed features and operations that are not primary first, then I feel I risk my (and the projects) timeline without addressing issues that allow the feature to operate.  You may have seen this occur where...