Skip to main content

Murder Rooms and Employee Polls

Just to define what a Murder Room is, it's a game not unlike the board game Clue, where the people in the room are told about a murder and the people playing (and paying for it) can ask the staff (role playing staff) questions about the murder, victim, etc. in a effort to uncover who the murderer is.  Lying is not allowed and the enjoyment is in piecing the clues together for the final outcome.

Because it's a game, players ask simple questions that build a trail of discovery to find the murderer.  This is fun in a game, but if you really want the cut to the chase, players could ask more pointed and direct questions for a quicker outcome.  But for a game the fun is in the journey.


Not as much fun if the "game" is your job and the murder room is the company you work for.

Company employee polls are not unlike a Murder Room, except he company never really want heavy truths (would prefer "light" issues only) and the staff never really gives the direct answers.

Clue #1 : If the response rate is low, then you may have bigger issues.

Clue #2 : If the employer can narrow down the respondent by the answers (location, years with company, position, building, department, etc), then staff may not be very forth coming with "reality" as they see it.  This could result in Clue #1.

Clue #3 : Wimpy / Puff questions.  Questions that are rather general (how well do you like your job?) can dance around issues and even be used to assume that unhappy employee are the issue and not something with the company.  What about questions like "Would you still be working here if you could get another job with the same salary, benefits and location?  Do you feel the company has majors issues?  If you where a prospective customer, would you spend your money on our product or services?

Clue #4 : Little or no follow up.  If the pool results are never published, it's been deep 6's.  Buried, trash canned, killed with the results being a NOP (No Operation or changes occurring).   If the response rate was low and they just re-send the same poll out for a "better" response with out addressing the "core" reasons for low response, well, the company also has bigger issues.

Clue #5 : If the companies response to the poll results is more "Ra Ra" sessions (lets meet for a free lunch and t-shirts), then, well you know they don't have a clue and / or don't care.

A company pool should ask the hard questions, be anonymous (make sure id's are not tracked by employee), published and followed up.  Followed up could be an additions poll or meetings with acknowledgment that specific issues exists and how (if possible) they can be addressed.  Of course if the primary issue is management (or the culture resulting from said management), then it may all be for not.

I've seen both responsive and not responsive companies.  Just how the employee polls are handled can tell you a lot about which boat you are in.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is no "Right" way.

It's not that your way is not the right way, it's that everyone has their own right way.  So which is the right way?  Is there a right way? Software development is full of discussions that revolve about the "right" way of doing something. The terms used in discussing software design, tools and implementation are so undefined as to make them meaningless.  Code is not designed and written in a vacuum, it's designed by real people in real companies, each with their own constraints and issues.  Code that may look like a hack could have been the result of an employee dragged out of bed at 2am by a company shirt that only cared that they they did not lose their personal client the next morning.  Everything must be looked at in context.  A project written to "Best Practices" may never be finished before development funding dries up.   Goals, vision, constraints and thoughts should be somewhat aligned for project to be successful (or at least enjoyable ...

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right.  This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing?  This time, the light was right.  It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right.  The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field.  I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right.  This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right.  The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!).  The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background.  Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king.  Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...

So THIS is My Style?

 If I play around long enough my style will appear.  I'm guessing that this is kind of it.  I'll keep working on other techniques in watercolor but for now this appears to be my style. I do like it and others appear (to my face) to also like this.  Not every one of my paintings is a success.  About 1/3 so far, but when they do I am rather pleased that anything good comes out of it at all. I do love color.  Color is happy and outdoors is full of color, be it the west or back east with the greens.  Color color color. Also doing some painting on hot press paper and see how that goes. Later......