Skip to main content

Rock Climbing and HTML (or any Development)

I'm an old timer in Rock climbing.  Not the Faux climbing in the gym but on real rock with whatever surface erosion has provided for it.  I remember a boulder problem on Mt. Woodson that was called Television Screen (aka, Super Edge).  It was a big rectangular block that was tilted just off vertical with an irregular surface and this wonder edge that also had variations in it.  There was just enough of both to provide light hand and food holds to lie back off of while edging with your feet on the face.  It was rated 5.10 and just on the edge of what I could do with my new (then) EB climbing shoes.

I was so proud of finally being able to climb it with my new EB shoes.  Then a friend of mine just scurried up in the running shoes!  I could not believe it, regular shoes and much less effort!

The difference between the two of us was the context, me -vs- him.  I could do it but I needed better shoes and it was still hard.  He just needed to try.

The same is true of software development.  The rock is the project, the shoes the tools and the context is whom is climbing.  

This lesson reappeared in the tech press last week with a team at Sencha decided to re-duplicate the slow parts of the Fastbook app in HTML to show that it's not HTML's fault that the original FastBook app was slow.

In this case Sencha's Fastbook app is the project, the tool HTML and the context is the Sencha programmers.  The Fastbook project indeed shows a much faster HTML application using Sencha's tools and just HTML.  However they miss the point and the point is context.  What works in one context may not work in another.

The context is 1) the staff doing the work, the 2) other internal goals of the project and 3) a bucket of other restrictions, limits, requirements and forces that shape the outcome in any project.  Yes, given almost any tool, almost any project can be created and be successful given the perfect context (that is what Sencha had).  

But most context is imperfect and just like in Fastbook, the context did not allow the creation of an HTML application that was expected.  Re-writing the same application in native code would work given the same context and indeed did provide the expected application.

This lesson is replayed again and again for 1) design methodology, 2) project management, 3) language and tools and almost any other holy grail of development that is hyped in the industry.  Context beats all.

It's like that definition of insanity : "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result", but with a twist : "Doing the same project with different people, different processes and a different company and expecting the same result, is insanity".



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

There is no "Right" way.

It's not that your way is not the right way, it's that everyone has their own right way.  So which is the right way?  Is there a right way? Software development is full of discussions that revolve about the "right" way of doing something. The terms used in discussing software design, tools and implementation are so undefined as to make them meaningless.  Code is not designed and written in a vacuum, it's designed by real people in real companies, each with their own constraints and issues.  Code that may look like a hack could have been the result of an employee dragged out of bed at 2am by a company shirt that only cared that they they did not lose their personal client the next morning.  Everything must be looked at in context.  A project written to "Best Practices" may never be finished before development funding dries up.   Goals, vision, constraints and thoughts should be somewhat aligned for project to be successful (or at least enjoyable ...
1 comment
Read more

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right.  This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing?  This time, the light was right.  It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right.  The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field.  I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right.  This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right.  The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!).  The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background.  Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king.  Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...
Post a Comment
Read more

So THIS is My Style?

 If I play around long enough my style will appear.  I'm guessing that this is kind of it.  I'll keep working on other techniques in watercolor but for now this appears to be my style. I do like it and others appear (to my face) to also like this.  Not every one of my paintings is a success.  About 1/3 so far, but when they do I am rather pleased that anything good comes out of it at all. I do love color.  Color is happy and outdoors is full of color, be it the west or back east with the greens.  Color color color. Also doing some painting on hot press paper and see how that goes. Later......
Post a Comment
Read more