Skip to main content

The Developer and the 3 Bears

I've been revisiting HTML5 developing of late.  What I've found is three broad categories (I group by nature and habit), of current HTML5 development methods.

They are:

  • The tried and true, create your HTML page, add JavaScript and sprinkle with CSS.  
  • Use "heavy weight" framework like Sencha's Ext-JS.  Heavy weight in sense of complexity and understanding.  Even for me it's a bit over whelming.
  • Find a middle ground method that is in between the "build everything from the ground up" approach and the "kitchen sink" toolkits and libraries.


I think I have found my "porridge that's just right" development method in the form of Enyo.js.  This is the framework that was born out of WebOS and is now in it's 2.0 release.  It's refreshing not to work in an all too common 0.999 release of a project and with the simplicity and clarity of design and implementation that eludes a project like Sencha EXT-JS.

The Enyo.js concept clicked with me with the design of reusable components, event handling, application layout and data just felt right.  With Enyo.js I look at web development in a whole (and pleasant) light in the form of components and event handling that mirror the code being written.

This is interesting as it makes me think of what a web page is.  Not to little structure, not too complex but just right.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Current Desktop and Happy Vining.

It's been a big switch when I quit my old procession (Software Engineer) and ventured into the unknown.  So this is my current desktop.   First it's a REAL desktop and not a computer screen. Second, I've had to learn a whole new set of tools.  You would think a pencil is just a pencil and a paint brush is just a paint brush, but noooooo, they are tools into you mind and that's what needs re-tooling. The tactual nature of these tools and operation as much more rewarding (and frustrating too) than typing code in an IDE.   That had it's incentive but that well went dry and life changes,  so I changed. The pleasure of creating colors (no RGB involved) ad hoc wise is interesting.  Getting the technique to merge them on paper is very tough.  You do not know what you're going to get, so you just have to go with it. I'm glad that I can do a lot of other things instead of Software, but I hope that others in my past procession work on other pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right.  This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing?  This time, the light was right.  It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right.  The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field.  I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right.  This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right.  The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!).  The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background.  Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king.  Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought Patterns

I know how I work.  How a think about, visualize a problem and go about mentally design a solution and implement it in code.  My thought pattern works pretty well for me on most occasions, but not always. There are times when I have a force myself to change my thought pattern because of the problem I'm solving requires a different mindset.  Anyway, this posting is about how I work most of the time.  Here is goes. I quickly break down a feature into operations that are required to exists and tackle that code first.  My thinking is that, if I can solve the primary issues first, then secondary features will fall into "known knowns" and I can address those at anytime (and sometimes at my leisure) and this allows me to meet my internal timeline. If I addressed features and operations that are not primary first, then I feel I risk my (and the projects) timeline without addressing issues that allow the feature to operate.  You may have seen this occur where...
Post a Comment
Read more