I've been revisiting HTML5 developing of late. What I've found is three broad categories (I group by nature and habit), of current HTML5 development methods.
They are:
I think I have found my "porridge that's just right" development method in the form of Enyo.js. This is the framework that was born out of WebOS and is now in it's 2.0 release. It's refreshing not to work in an all too common 0.999 release of a project and with the simplicity and clarity of design and implementation that eludes a project like Sencha EXT-JS.
The Enyo.js concept clicked with me with the design of reusable components, event handling, application layout and data just felt right. With Enyo.js I look at web development in a whole (and pleasant) light in the form of components and event handling that mirror the code being written.
This is interesting as it makes me think of what a web page is. Not to little structure, not too complex but just right.
They are:
- The tried and true, create your HTML page, add JavaScript and sprinkle with CSS.
- Use "heavy weight" framework like Sencha's Ext-JS. Heavy weight in sense of complexity and understanding. Even for me it's a bit over whelming.
- Find a middle ground method that is in between the "build everything from the ground up" approach and the "kitchen sink" toolkits and libraries.
I think I have found my "porridge that's just right" development method in the form of Enyo.js. This is the framework that was born out of WebOS and is now in it's 2.0 release. It's refreshing not to work in an all too common 0.999 release of a project and with the simplicity and clarity of design and implementation that eludes a project like Sencha EXT-JS.
The Enyo.js concept clicked with me with the design of reusable components, event handling, application layout and data just felt right. With Enyo.js I look at web development in a whole (and pleasant) light in the form of components and event handling that mirror the code being written.
This is interesting as it makes me think of what a web page is. Not to little structure, not too complex but just right.
Comments
Post a Comment