Skip to main content

Coupling....

I've been thinking about coupling for a while now.  It's more than just one class or process knowing about another class or process, that happens all the time.  It's about using the minimum amount of coupling in a program for it's operation.  

Coupling is not a 'one size fits all' issue where there is a right and a wrong way to use it.  It's more of understanding when to use it, when it happens by accident and in general, being aware of the repercussions when too much coupling exists.

In my mind, coupling exists when there is a specific relationship between two classes or processes.  This relationship must be explicit where one class must be coupled by another into for some operation to be viable.  This is not the same as just passing data from one object to another where the data couple be in the form of a third data object (a model, strings, streams, etc) where the two objects are not really bound together but there data is.  This is about objects like a View having access to a model in the MVC pattern but the Model does not have access to the view.   

Coupling can be reduced by providing dynamic patters to abstract away direct coupling, but this has side effects.  Using multiple levels of indirection to avoid coupling can lead to logic that is hard to understand or maintain by other programmers later in the projects lifecycle.  Abstracting connections without a firm business needs may make the code overly complex and hide the classes relationships.   You can see this patten when using reflection that may then load a configuration file that loads a class that...... you get the picture.  Not fun to modify or debug.

On the other side the coin is how indirect coupling can be created by over use of patterns like dependance injection where annotations spread through the source files with little thought on the tangled relationships that ensue throughout the code.  Dependance injections is wonderful but not if it obfuscates the is-a and has-a relationships into a mass of dependancies.  Dependance injection does not replace the design and understanding of the class relationships and operation.

Coupling issue are not limited to source code.  The same could be said of build projects, unit tests and other supporting aspects of a project.  

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Current Desktop and Happy Vining.

It's been a big switch when I quit my old procession (Software Engineer) and ventured into the unknown.  So this is my current desktop.   First it's a REAL desktop and not a computer screen. Second, I've had to learn a whole new set of tools.  You would think a pencil is just a pencil and a paint brush is just a paint brush, but noooooo, they are tools into you mind and that's what needs re-tooling. The tactual nature of these tools and operation as much more rewarding (and frustrating too) than typing code in an IDE.   That had it's incentive but that well went dry and life changes,  so I changed. The pleasure of creating colors (no RGB involved) ad hoc wise is interesting.  Getting the technique to merge them on paper is very tough.  You do not know what you're going to get, so you just have to go with it. I'm glad that I can do a lot of other things instead of Software, but I hope that others in my past procession work on other pa...

3rd Try is a Charm

I've been trying to draw / paint these barns for a couple of years but never felt or got them right.  This time I think they turned out right. So What went wrong before and what's right now with this drawing?  This time, the light was right.  It's coming from the upper right and the shadows just looked right.  The other thing is the corn field on the left had to "be in season", otherwise it's just a plowed field.  I had taken other photos from different angles but they never felt right.  This angle has the road, power lines, corn field, etc. all leading to the right.  The shadows on the lower right helps fill in that corner (don't forget about the corners!).  The last part is trying to draw (ink paint maybe) the trees in the background.  Not so easy when they are kind of a blob is green shades. So yeah, it's composition that is king.  Many times I just don't see it until the drawing / painting is finished and when it's right it feels goo...

Thought Patterns

I know how I work.  How a think about, visualize a problem and go about mentally design a solution and implement it in code.  My thought pattern works pretty well for me on most occasions, but not always. There are times when I have a force myself to change my thought pattern because of the problem I'm solving requires a different mindset.  Anyway, this posting is about how I work most of the time.  Here is goes. I quickly break down a feature into operations that are required to exists and tackle that code first.  My thinking is that, if I can solve the primary issues first, then secondary features will fall into "known knowns" and I can address those at anytime (and sometimes at my leisure) and this allows me to meet my internal timeline. If I addressed features and operations that are not primary first, then I feel I risk my (and the projects) timeline without addressing issues that allow the feature to operate.  You may have seen this occur where...